BBVA re­corded a re­cord loss of 1.792 mi­llion in Q1,20

Fitch Lowers BBVA’s Long-Term Senior Debt Rating By One Notch To A –

BBVA.
BBVA.

POSTED BY: THE CORNER 24TH JUNE 2020.- Rating agency Fitch has down­graded BBVA’s lon­g-­term ra­ting by one notch. The ra­ting is now “A-” with a “stable” outlook from “A” with Rating Watch Negative. The main reasons for the down­grade are the eco­nomic de­te­rio­ra­tion in the re­gions where the bank is pre­sent, es­pe­cially Mexico and Spain. Fitch be­lieves the fi­nan­cial ins­ti­tu­tion will find it more dif­fi­cult to main­tain its cu­rrent le­vels of ope­ra­ting profit in those two mar­kets.

However, it also flags that even after losing a rating notch, BBVA has sufficient financial cushion, geographical diversification and a good competitive position in its reference markets to avoid being affected by new downward revisions in the short term.

BBVA recorded a record loss of 1.792 million euros in Q1’20 (vs -155 million euros in Q4’19) due to Covid-19 and the deterioration in value of its US franchise. Furthermore, the capital ratio CET1 fell to 10.84% ( – 90 bp in the quarter) and is in the low range of the sector average. Finally, Latin America and Turkey account for nearly 62% of revenues.

Regarding the message from the European regulator about the approach to recognising asset quality ratios, analysts at Santander Corporate & Investment believe that BBVA (like other European banks) has adopted a “look beyond” approach to recognition and provisions for NPLs. The aim is to take into account the economic recovery expected towards the end of 2020 and 2021, rather than the significant contraction in GDP estimated until then.

“BBVA’s approach is more conservative than that of its peers in terms of generic provisions for coronavirus in its Q1’20 results. But despite this, we consider there is a risk of a worsening in the bank’s forecast for a cost of risk in the 150-180 bp range in 2020, compared to 257 bp in Q1’20, due to the anticipated generic provision of €1.4 Bn registered in that quarter. Excluding this provision, the cost of risk would have remained relatively stable quarter-on-quarter at 115 bp (up from 112 bp in Q4’19 and 103 bp in Q1’19).”

Artículos relacionados